Talk:Naming Scheme: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "* There's a risk that we'll accidentally create duplicate entries for people and never realize it. It'd be nice to be able to run nightly checks to look for possible duplicates...." |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 15:08, 10 October 2010
- There's a risk that we'll accidentally create duplicate entries for people and never realize it. It'd be nice to be able to run nightly checks to look for possible duplicates. -- Jim.Lindstrom
- Standardizing our naming schemes would also solve this problem. -- Elindstr 22:23, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- Good proposal. I think that all it needs is a means of doing conflict resolution. (I.e., how do we handle it if that algorithm results in two people whose pages would have the same name?)--Jim.lindstrom 03:11, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- See naming scheme edit: append birth year. -- Elindstr 04:34, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Good proposal. I think that all it needs is a means of doing conflict resolution. (I.e., how do we handle it if that algorithm results in two people whose pages would have the same name?)--Jim.lindstrom 03:11, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Standardizing our naming schemes would also solve this problem. -- Elindstr 22:23, 29 September 2010 (UTC)